# Results for Studies of Hard-to-Measure Radionuclides in the Metal of Chornobyl Nuclear Power Plant Equipment being Dismanlted, and Estimation of Scaling Factor

A. M., Maksymenko1, M. D. Bondarkov1, B. Ya. Oskolkov1, V. A. Seida2,
V. N. Dubas2

1SSRI “Chornobyl Center for Nuclear Safety, Radioactive Waste and Radioecology”, Slavutych, 07101, Ukraine
2SSE “Chornobyl NPP”, Slavutych, 07101, Ukraine

DOI: doi.org/10.31717/2311-8253.19.1.8

### Abstract

The results of studies are presented for hard-to-measure radionuclides 55Fe, 59Ni, 63Ni, 90Sr, 239,240Pu, 238Pu, 241Pu, 241Am, 234U, 235,236U, 238U in the surface contamination of the metal of ChNPP equipment, being dismantled. The estimation of scaling factors for hard-to-measure radionuclides is given.

In the process of the Chornobyl NPP decommissioning, a large amount of equipment is dismantled, the metal of which has only the surface radioactive contamination. Under condition of successful decontamination of this metal, it is possible to release it from the regulatory control by clearance. The study of complete volume of the metal being dismantled for
hard-to-measure radionuclides (HMR) content is a complex and expensive task. Reducing the cost for HMR specific activity measurement is possible by measuring key radionuclides followed by calculating HMR using the empirical scaling factors (SF).

The main objectives of this work were to determine the activity of key radionuclides (KR) and HMR in the surface contamination layer of the decontaminated metal and to calculate the corresponding SF. To achieve the set objectives, it was necessary to solve the problem of measuring the specific activity of KR and HMR at the levels below the established exemption criteria.

These studies were carried out to the order of the SSE “Chornobyl NPP”, the main results are presented in the research report.

The measurements were carried out in four stages. The first stage was the preparation of the counting sample and measurement of the gamma-emitting radionuclides activity, including key radionuclides 60Co and 137Cs. The second stage was the dissolution of the counting sample after gamma spectrometry in the mixture of nitric and hydrochloric acids and the selection of an aliquot for the radiochemical analysis of 55Fe, 59Ni, 63Ni. The third stage was the selection of an aliquot for the radiochemical analysis of 239,240Pu, 238Pu, 241Pu, 241Am, 234U, 235,236U, 238U. The fourth stage is the selection of a sample weight of the analytical material and determination of 10Be activity.

Based on the criteria of referring radionuclides as key, of those listed in the Tables 2, 3,60Co and 137Cs can be considered as such radionuclides. The calculated correlation coefficients between these radionuclides and some of HMR are presented as the following values: 60Co – 63Ni – 0.60; 137Cs – 90Sr – 0.44; 137Cs – 239,240Pu – 0.61; 137Cs – 241Pu – 0.64; 137Cs – 241Am – 0.66.

The approaches to sampling used in this work and measurement methods made it possible to fairly reliably determine the activity of HMR in the metal samples of the ChNPP equipment being dismantled and to calculate SF for them and their total uncertainties that can be used in practice.

The large values of the total uncertainty of the scaling factors are due to the differences in the radionuclide ratios of radioactive contamination of the studied equipment fragments, the cause of which may be the differential use of decontamination (decontamination only of those fragments, which contamination levels exceeded the established levels, was carried out).

The obtained results allow us to conclude that, in order to determine SF for the purpose of exemption, it is necessary to apply the careful approach to the formation of the RM flux, for which the same method of decontamination is used.

Keywords: Chornobyl nuclear power plant, scaling factor, hard-to-measure radionuclide, specific activity, radioactive waste, release.

### Список використаної літератури

1. NP 306.4.159-2010. Order of radioactive materials release in the framework of the practical activity. Kyiv, 2010. (inUkr.)

2. ISO 21238:2007. Nuclear Energy – Nuclear Fuel Technology – Scaling Factor Method to Determine the Radioactivity of Fow- and Intermediate-level Radioactive Waste Packages Generated at Nuclear Power Plants. International Organization for Standardization, 2007, 23 p.

3. International Atomic Energy Agency (2009) Determination and Use of Scaling Factors for Waste Characterization in Nuclear Power Plants. IAEA Nuclear Energy Series, No. NW-T-1.18, Vienna.

4. Research effort report “Vypolneniye izmereniy obraztsov metalla oborudovaniya, demontiruyemogo v mashinnom zale pervoy ocheredi GSP CHAES s posleduyushchim raschetom koefftsiyentov proportsionalnosti dlya trudnoizmeryayemykh radionuklidov” [Measurement of metal samples of equipment dismantled in the turbine hall of the SSE ChNPP 1st Stage with the further calculation of the proportionality coefficients for hard-to-measure radionuclides], State Scientific and Research Institution “Chornobyl Center for Nuclear Safety, Radioactive Waste and Radioecology”, Slavutych. 2016. (in Russ.)

4. Terms of Reference for dismantling, processing, release of the equipment and constructions of the turbine hall of the SSE ChNPP Unit 1. (in Ukr.)

5. Gerasimov V. V., Kasperovich A. I., Martynova O. I. (1976) Vodnyy rezhim atomnykh stantsiy [Water regime of nuclear power plants], Moscow: Atomizdat, 400 p. (in Russ.)

6. Bariahtar V. G. (Ed.) (1995) Chernobylskaya katastrofa [Chernobyl accident], Kyiv: Naukova Dumka, 559 p. (in Russ.)

7. Gerasko V. N., Klyuchnikov A. A., Korneev A. A., Kupny V. I., et al. (1997) Obyekt “Ukrytiye”. Istoriya, sostoyaniye i perspektivy [Shelter Object. History, status and prospects], Kyiv, Intergraph, 224 p. (in Russ.)

8. DollezhalN. A. (1983) Analizprichiniposledstviyavariynogo razryva kanala 62-44 reaktora bloka №1 Chernobylskoy AES [Analysis of the reasons and consequences of the emergency rupture of channel 62-44 of the Chernobyl NPP Unit 1 reactor. Report 4.50], Moscow, (in Russ.)
9. FA RBMK-1000. Technical description, 862.00.000 TO. (in Russ.)

10. Technological radiation criteria, 39E-RPD. SSE Chernobyl NPP, 2016, 22 p. (in Russ.)

11. Passport No. 01-0041-05 for the radionuclide source of metrological designation of OISN type with radionuclides europium-152, cesium-137, titanium-44. Odesa: State Enterprise “Odessa Research and Production Center for Ecological Safety”, 2005. (in Russ.)

12. BockR. (1984) Metody razlozheniyavanaliticheskoy khimii [Methods of decomposition in analytical chemistry]. Chemistry, Moscow, 432 p. (in Russ.)

13. Bondarkov M. D., Maksimenko A. M., Oskolkov B. Ya., et al. (2013) Research effort report “Determination of radioisotope composition and activity of special items in the central halls of Units 1, 2, 3, which are not subject to LLCL waste processing . Development of methods for measuring special products. Preparation of proposals on their management”. Slavutych: SSRI “Chornobyl Center for Nuclear Safety, Radioactive Waste and Radioecology”, (in Russ.)

14. Vajda N., Molnar Zs., Kabai E., Osvath Sz. (2003), Simultaneous determination of long-lived radionunuclides in environmental samples. Environmental Radiochemical Analysis II, June, 185-196 pp.

15. Operating Manual. FHT 770 T Multi-Low-Level-Counter for measurement of low level alpha and beta activity in samples up to 60 mm diameter. Eberline Instruments.

16. IAEA Analytical Quality in Nuclear Applications Series No. 37 (2014) A Procedure for the Sequential Determination of Radionuclides in Environmental Samples. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna.

17. IAEA Analytical QualityinNuclear ApplicationsNo. IAEA/ AQ/11 (2009) A Procedure for the Rapid Determination of Pu Isotopes and Am-241 in Soil and Sediment Samples by Alpha Spectrometry. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna.

18. Ampelegova N. I., Simanovsky Yu. M., Trapeznikov A. A. (1982) Dezaktivatsiya v yadernoy energetike [Decontamination in nuclear power], Moscow: Energoizdat, 256 p. (in Russ.)

Full Text (PDF)

Published
2019-05-31

If the article is accepted for publication in the journal «Industrial Heat Engineering» the author must sign an agreement on transfer of copyright. The agreement is sent to the postal (original) or e-mail address (scanned copy) of the journal editions.

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License International CC-BY that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.

Insert math as
$${}$$