Metalophysical Problems of WWER Reactor Vessel
Welding Joints Reliability

І. G. Sharaevsky, Т. S. Vlasenko, L. B. Zimin,
А. V. Nоsоvskyi, N. М. Fіаlkо, G. І. Sharaevsky

Institute for Safety Problems of Nuclear Power Plants,
NAS of Ukraine, 12, Lysogirska st., Kyiv, 03028, Ukraine

DOI: doi.org/10.31717/2311-8253.22.3.1

Abstract

The prospects and possibilities of replacing the capacities of nuclear power units of Ukrainian nuclear power plants, which are currently almost completely depleting their operational life, as well as the possibility of extending the guaranteed service life are analyzed and generalized. Based on the study of reactor construction trends and proposals on the world market, a basic promising modern model of a high-capacity 3+ AP1000 nuclear water reactor manufactured by Westinghouse El. Corp. was selected and recommended as a basic promising for use in Ukraine. The results of new studies on the dynamics of strength loss of reactor steels of WWER reactors and their welding joints under the action of radiation are considered. The main attention is paid to the presence and processes of migration and segregation in the crystal structure of reactor steels of harmful impurities, in particular phosphorus and nickel. It is concluded that there are significant advantages of new foreign metallurgical technologies, the use of which in vessel steels provides reliability and increased guaranteed life of safe operation of PWR reactors, in particular, AP1000 type made in the USA. The urgent problems of commissioning additional shunting capacities in the National Unified Energy System of Ukraine were assessed and the conclusion was made that they can be solved by improving the shunting characteristics of existing high-capacity nuclear power
units and (mainly) by accelerating construction and commissioning of small modular reactors with high shunting characteristics, in particular the SMR-160 model manufactured by SMR LLC (USA).

Keywords: nuclear power unit, service life, reactor vessel, radiation embrittlement of steel, equipment replacement.

References

1. Reactor steel. Working conditions of structural materials and requirements for them. Available at:steelcast.ru/reactorsteel100. (in Rus.)
2. Kasatkin О. G. (2009). [Thermal embrittlement of weldedjoints of VVER-type reactor vessels]. Problems of Atomic Science and Technology, vol. 94, no. 4–2, pp. 232–235. (in Rus.)
3. Karzov G. P., Теplukhina I. V. (2011). [Materials science aspects of new principles for improving the performance of heat-resistant steels for NPP cases and their practical implementation]. Problems of Atomic Science and Technology, vol. 2, pp. 46–53. (in Rus.)
4. Natesan K., Majumdar S., Shankar P. S., Shah V. N. (2006). Preliminary materials selection issues for the next generation nuclear power plants pressure vessel. Report ANL/EXT-06-45. Argonne: Argonne National Laboratory, 109 p.
5. Integrity of reactor pressure vessels in nuclear power plants assessment of irradiation embrittlement effects andreactor pressure vessel steels. IAEA Nuclear Energy Series NP-T-3.11. Vienna: IAEA, 2009, 156 p.
6. Druce S. G., Gage G., Jordan G. (1986). Effect of ageingon properties of pressure vessel steel. Acta Metallurgica, vol. 4, pp. 641–652.
7. Standard guide for in-service annealing of light-water moderated nuclear reactor vessels. ASTM E509–03. West Conshohocken, 2008, 11 p. Available at: https://www.astm.org/e0509-03r08.html.
8. Bulloch J. H. (1994). Reversed temper embrittlement — environmentally assisted cracking interactions in ferrite low alloy steels. Theor. And Appl. Fracture Mech., vol. 21, pp. 143–155.
9. Herring D. H. (2006). The heat treat doctor: The embrittlement phenomena in hardened tempered steel. Industrial Heating. Available at: http://www.industrialheating.com/Aarticles/Column/34f38218045ae010VgnVCM100000f932a8c0.
10. Kasatkin О. G. (1988). [The mechanism of embrittlement of welded joints of VVER type reactor vessels under the  action of impurities]. Proceedings of the V Intern. Scientificpractical. Conf. “Materials science problems in the design, manufacture and operation of nuclear power plant equipment” (Pushkin, July 7–14, 1988). St. Petersburg: Prometheus, pp. 168–176. (in Rus.)
11. Gorynin I. V., Ignatov V. А., Тimofeev B. Т., Shkatov Yu. I. (1983). [Application of new welding consumables for circumferential welds on high power NPP reactor vessels]. Аvtomaticheskaya svarka [Automatic welding], vol. 10, pp. 38–42. (in Rus.)
12. Gorynin I. V., Karpov G. P., Тimofeev B. Т., Galiatkin S. N. (2006). [Improvement of materials and welding technology to improve the safety and resource life of NPPs with VVER reactors]. Аvtomaticheskaya svarka [Automatic welding], vol. 3, pp. 3–8. (in Rus.)
13. Аlekseenko N. N., Аmaev А. D., Gorynin I. V., Nikolaev V. А.; Gorynin I. V. (ed.) (1981). Radiacionnoe povrezhdenie stali korpusov vodo-vodianykh reaktorov [Radiation damage to the steel of pressurized water reactors].Мoscow: Energoizdat, 192 p. (in Rus.)
14. Parshin А. М., Platonov P. А. (eds) (1997). Radiatsionnaya povrezhdaemost’ i raboosposobnost’ konstrukcionnykh materialov [Radiation damage and performance of structural materials]. St. Petersburg: Politekhnika, 312 p. (in Rus.)
15. USSR State Committee for the Supervision of Safe Work in the Nuclear Power Industry (1989). PNAE G-7-002-86. Norms for calculating the strength of equipment and pipelines of nuclear power plants. Moscow: Energoatomizdat, 525 p. (in Russ.)
16. Vinogradov R. Р., Daunis М. А., Тimofeev В. Т., et al. (1976). [Fatigue strength of the weld metal of welded joints made of steel grade 15Kh2NMFA-A]. Voprosy sudostroenija. Ser. Svarka [Shipbuilding Issues. Series Welding], vol. 22, pp. 46–54. (in Rus.)
17. Моrozov А. М., Nikolaev V. А., Jurchenko Е. V., Vasil’ev V. G. (2000). [Influence of nickel on radiation embrittlement of base metal and weld metal of steel 15Kh2NMFA-A]. Proceedings of the VI Intern. Conf. “Problems of materials science in the design, manufacture and operation of nuclear power plant equipment” (St. Petersburg, June 19–23, 2000). St. Petersburg: Prometheus, pp. 372–396. (in Rus.)
18. Azarov S. I., Sydorenko V. L. (2019). [Review of the state of world nuclear energy]. Problems of General Energy, vol. 1 (56), pp. 24–30. (in Ukr.)
19. Examination of accident at Tokyo Electric Power Co. Inc.’s Fukushima Daichi Nuclear Station and Proposal of Countermeasures. Japan Nuclear Technology Institute, 2012, pp. 35–42.
20. World Nuclear Association. Nuclear Power Reactors. Available at: http://www.world-nuclear.org/information-library/ nuclear-fuel-cycle/nuclear-power-reactors/nuclear-powerreactors.aspx
21. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). Power Reactor Information System (PRIS). Available at: https://pris.iaea.org/PRIS/CountryStatistics/CountryStatisticsLandingPage.aspx
22. Nechaeva Т. P. (2019). [Priority areas for long-term development of national nuclear energy]. Problems of General Energy, vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 27–34. (in Ukr.)
23. Nechaeva Т. P. (2018) [Estimation of expediency of perspective nuclear reactors introduction taking into account requirements to reliability and ecological functioning of UES of Ukraine]. Problems of General Energy, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 42–48. (in Ukr.)

Full Text (PDF)